References

  1. Bhattacharjee N., Lahiri I. Growth and value distribution of differential polynomials. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie (N.S.) 1996, 39 (87) (1-4), 85-104.
  2. Bergweiler W. On the Nevanlinna Characteristic of a composite function. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 1988, 10 (2-3), 225-236. doi: 10.1080/17476938808814301
  3. Bergweiler W. On the growth rate of composite meromorphic functions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ. 1990, 14 (1-4), 187-196. doi: 10.1080/17476939008814417
  4. Bernal L. Orden relative de crecimiento de funciones enteras. Collect. Math. 1988, 39, 209-229.
  5. Biswas T. Comparative growth analysis of differential monomials and differential polynomials depending on their relative $_{p}L^{\ast }$-orders. J. Chungcheong Math. Soc. 2018, 31(1), 103-130. doi: 10.14403/jcms.2018.31.1.103
  6. Doeringer W. Exceptional values of differential polynomials. Pacific J. Math. 1982, 98 (1), 55-62.
  7. Datta S.K., Biswas T., Hoque M.D.A. On some growth properties of differential polynomials in the light of relative order. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2014, 32, 235-246.
  8. Datta S.K., Biswas T., Bhattacharyya S. On relative order and relative type based growth properties of differential monomials. J. Indian Math. Soc. (N.S.) 2015, 82 (3-4), 39-52.
  9. Datta S.K., Biswas T. On the comparative growth analysis of differential polynomials depending upon their relative orders, relative type and relative weak type. Facta Univ. Ser. Math. Inform. 2016, 31 (2), 465-484.
  10. Datta S.K., Biswas T. Comparative growth estimates of differential monomials depending upon their relative orders, relative type and relative weak type. Konuralp J. Math. 2016, 4 (2), 230-246.
  11. Datta S.K., Biswas T. On a result of Bergweiler. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2009, 51 (1), 33-37.
  12. Datta S.K., Biswas T., Biswas C. Measure of growth ratios of composite entire and meromorphic functions with a focus on relative order. Int. J. Math. Sci. Eng. Appl. 2014, 8 (IV), 207-218.
  13. Hayman W.K. Meromorphic Functions. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1964.
  14. Lahiri I. Deficiencies of differential polynomials. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1999, 30 (5), 435-447.
  15. Lahiri I., Sharma D.K. Growth of composite entire and meromorphic functions. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1995, 26 (5), 451-458.
  16. Laine I. Nevanlinna Theory and Complex Differential Equations. In: Carstensen C., Farkas G. (Eds) De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 15. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1993.
  17. Lahiri B.K., Banerjee D. Relative order of entire and meromorphic functions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India Ser. A. 1999, 69 (A) (3), 339-354.
  18. Somasundaram D., Thamizharasi R. A note the entire functions of L-bounded index and L-type. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1988, 19 (3), 284-293.
  19. Sons L.R. Deficiencies of monomials. Math. Z. 1969, 111 (1), 53-68.
  20. Yang L. Value distribution theory and its new research. Science Press, Beijing, 1982.
  21. Yi H.X. On a result of Singh. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 1990, 41 (3), 417-420. doi: 10.1017/S0004972700018293
  22. Yang C.C., Yi H.X. Uniqueness theory of meromorphic functions. In: Hazewinkel M. (Eds.) Mathematics and its Applications, 557. Kluwer Academic Publishers and Science Press, Beijing, 2003.
  23. Yang L. Value distribution theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
  24. Valiron G. Lectures on the general theory of integral functions. Chelsea Publishing Company, 1949.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported.